Creating an open and competitive framework for pension dashboards will accelerate innovation

Creating an open and competitive framework for pension dashboards will accelerate innovation

Centralisation vs competition

The DWP's suggestions for delivering the pension dashboard contain a stark contradiction.

Open standards, competition, and innovation are valued highly by the DWP, yet many of the most important choices favour centralised funding, a single supplier, and centralised infrastructure.

A free, competitive market in technology becomes an impossibility due to the centralised infrastructure mandated (the single Pension Finder Service and, initially, a single dashboard). It will be necessary for most dashboard technology to be purchased centrally, which will result in the government and/or regulator playing a considerably larger role in the dashboard's delivery. This would increase consumer costs and stifle innovation.

A model that has previously shown to be successful in several financial services technology markets, such as Open Banking and TISA Exchange open transfers, is one that we would want to see implemented in the market for dashboard technology: an open, competitive market. This decentralization would foster innovation, increase speed to market, and reduce costs. No technology provider would hold a monopoly, and over time it’s likely that new vendors would enter the market, bringing innovative ideas for further evolution.

Fostering competition

We all hope that the pension dashboard will serve as a launching pad for the introduction of more comprehensive services that will allow consumers to view all of their retirement funding—not just pensions—in one place. This view may even extend to their entire financial picture, which includes debts, insurance, investments, and savings. However, the centralised method that is being suggested will create a barrier to realizing this potential and discourage the introduction of new, creative players.

The now-abandoned Pot-Follows-Member solution was given the recommendation of an open and competitive architecture by the DWP. We urge them to reconsider the pension dashboard and provide an open and competitive environment that will foster innovation and give customers more options.

Related Articles

Electronic Transfers Review


First Half of 2023 Review of UK Investment Transfer Market

Find out what happened in the UK Investment Transfer market in the first half of 2023
Read Article


ViaNova/TeX - Automating Corporate Pension Transfers

In this session our expert panel will examine how the ViaNova Working Group and TeX worked together to develop those standards to support electronic pension transfers, resulting in significant reductions in the time and cost to process DC and DB transfers.
Watch Webcast


Equisoft/transfer User Group

This user group was a valuable opportunity to get updates on the electronic transfer market, TeX, ViaNova and the Pay.UK Cash ISA Transfer Service- as well as changes to Equisoft/transfer, formerly known as ATG.
Watch Webcast